About Me

Name: That Darn Republican
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Bail Out Part II: A Fix That Could Work And Work Big

In resuming the review of issues that were mitigating factors in the carnage we are seeing now even in the last 24 hours we've seen the Fed have to step in and eschew the collapse of Washington Mutual, by slipping at the 11th hour and selling it to Chase Group. I cannot emphasize this enough, an immediate common sense intervention needs to occur. In the first part of my discussion, I highlighted the value in the establishment of a system of credit checks and balances that govern banks behavior. Secondly, rerouting authority to liquidate REO inventories to the FDIC and make them directly responsible and accountable for the orderly, fair and equitable transfer of default housing stock piles from the non performing asset category to a position banks can now begin to receive an injection of liquidity from the Fed on. This we cannot allow to have happen here:
  • Foreign Banks investment in domestic restructuring, that is a flat out transfer of wealth.
  • Cannot have the Fed step in and pay for something the private sector could prosper and quickly and more effectively.
  • Continue with an out modded credit system that is woefully inadequate and does not meet the market quirks of today.
  • Allow banks to issue non-secured debt to high walk away credit risks while home loans stay by-in-large unaccessible for no real reason. 
While it is commonly understood that we do not have a right to own a home, as taxpayers [however] we do have a right to have access to make this happen. Our system at present is not accessible, because of continued outside idealogical tampering, many will never see the American Dream in their lifetimes. They will be beholden to landlords for the rest of their lives, and that is not right. Now bad judgment is one reason... and no legislative act should interfere with personal growth. But at the risk of sounding like a drum beater, I have to just be frank. There are many voices within our own government who simply do not care if you ever own a home, and some act with impunity so that doesn't happen. All you have to do is look at what so-called "solutions" they provide when a real situation comes about that you can put two and two together.  We are constantly under siege by people who are so well insulated, they cannot feel or ever relate to these extreme changes in market volatility.
 
One of the considerations not to be overlooked is the fact that this is non-homeowner taxpayer money being used here as well. Why should they get stuck with a tab they had no part in. Of course one of the first retorts there will be the system is going down and it will take them with it if nothing is done, which merits value.  However, do we disregard the strength of the argument it's not my fight so.... ? No, of course not. But that is an ever strong advocation for a plan that allows for access. If taxpayers had access, with reasonalbe system controls and oversight. Taxpayers would stir the maret with thier investment in the home and small business would be the first to see the benefit.
 
To effect a quick change the need to:
 
 
  • Restructure our credit and lending structure first to give clear guidelines for taxpayers and banks expecially to be guided by, with the emphasis on your income being the prime determining factor in your credibility and set up rules for how much unsecured debt you can have owning a home and not owning a home, and loow for the flexibility for that to change as your lifestyle does.
  • Turn the REO inventories over to the FDIC to allow them to liquidate without real estate lobby interventionism.
  • Institute an across the board 25% write-down on the stated value of the loan balance of homes in super soft markets, and 7%-10% on the rest. Then chuck the "comps" system for housing values equivalence. Go back 40 years to county assosor values and the avergae rate of appreciation and use that as the forward guide with algorythms that account for modest increases due to populations density and demand.
  • Ban HELOC's [home equity lines of crdit] for use with vanity spending, the one consistant argument one both sides of the political fense has been that folks were keeping up with the Jones'. Their equity should be for education, opening a small business or retirement purposes. Your disposable and investment income should go to vanity expenses. You want the new car, do it the old fashoned way, earn it.
  • Cap the incomes of all Publically owned company CEO's as well as their net benefit packages, if you want an uncapped income, stay private and let the venture capitalists provide a solution for your grown needs. Once you go public, stability should be of paramount concern.
  • Put the dollar back on the gold standard, our currency cannot be worth what we say it is simply because we say it is. It needs to be at least 60% vested in gold reserves. That will settle softness in inflated consumer goods prices and housing prices and ease our national deficit considerably.

 If we just start there, I strongly believe we will be well on the way to not only a stronger tomorrow, but a safer one as well. But the shifty eyed back room tactics right now are telling us anything we're ok, and more like this is business as unusual.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bail Out Fix: A Plan That Could Work And Work Big

Amidst the huddles of partisan strategizing and even more public finger pointing, there hasn't been one suggestion to come from either camp until late yesterday that was even remotely feasible. I'll have to say this; the republicans have an advantage with Congressman Boehner leading the charge to ferret out those who still think nationalizing the mortgage industry bailout is even remotely practical. Chief wolf crier Barney Frank's stood up and had the unmitigated gall to even think he could try to blast senate republicans for being the instrument on amenity in the debacle when as the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee his hands are infused to complicity as teas is to hot water.  It was his name who appeared in the top 6 names one the take from Freddie/Mac, along with Chris Dodd and Barack Obama regarding campaign contributions, so of course he is not gonna come out and slam them for the appearance of any financial impropriety. Not to say there may not have been any republicans in the mix [I believe one from the he mid-west], but the majority of this backhanded display from liberals in play have yet to be fully vetted yet.
 
The question is what were the major contributing factors in what compounded then accelerated this mess into the national meltdown it is now? Simple, the following are just a sampling of the major contributing factors that lead up to this crisis:
 
  1. Bill Clinton not providing enough oversight during the S&L crisis: It opened the door for more abuses - it is he who gave the cow away and left milk everywhere.
  2. Allowing Realtors to liquidate REO's for banks: That was a grand ethics violation right there ala, the 1992 Insider Information Act. Banks took an awful risk getting real estate agents to sell their non performing assets at market value. Boy, that sure makes up for a lot of  lot bank fees right there. The banks don't own that property in the traditional sense of ownership - brokers had no business in  the mix.
  3. Not letting the public gain access to the REO inventories en masse: This was trickle down in the worse way. Only those who had the knowledge of the properties got access but was marketed as exclusive, and are back for more. Not so, the taxpayer had a right to access.
  4. Misguided credit guidelines  for home loans:  What we have is antiquated and doesn't reflect changes in the market today.
  5. Not capping the income and benefits:  The CEO's of public companies have different responsibilities once public, and self benefit isn't one.
  6. Outside Investment Of Foreign Banks:  Enter the dragon, socialists see money differently than capitalists - and when allowed to invest in our infrastructure, we undermine it. When we allowed the speculators back in, all of a sudden the "global" concern over US market direction was paramount to liberal law makers; thus the continued deaf ear to drilling in our own back yard by the same. it was only a matter of time before this reached a critical mass.

 

     Yes, this situation is paramount in being resolved, but do we rush a solution? I say it was planned that way. Simply put, the bigger the lie, th emore complicated the solution... in comes the money grab.  And that is exactly the plan they have on the table now, a 3/4 of a trillion dollar mortgage industry smash and grab at tax payer expense. Not to sound like some coffeehouse soothsayer, but this default has all the markings of an engineered collapse. Why else would it have happed precisely during a national election where the left has lined all its ducks up in a row? Why else would it have occurred when Putin has played his worst game of chess yet with the US? Georgia invasion - he waited until he thought we wouldn't do anything. Why else would would every major bank in the country not be able to lend until they get their way? It it a perfect storm of jack the system, and force government to pick up the tab - then bail scheme. But what needs to stop happening right now is blaming individuals with bad credit for the problem, they are not and we need to get used to the fact the 51% of the buying public has a FICO score of 620 or less [according to national surveys].  So we have a supply and demand problem right now... the supply of people with good credit is in minority, but their incomes are suspect, and so are the values of their property. So if there is a credit crunch and lending gets impaired like it already is, solvency levels are low because there is no lending because the reserve won't makes loans to banks with below level performance on their books... The obvious question here is why should the Fed step in and buy up what the public has more money to do in the first place? My solution to the credit/housing crisis is one that could have the most lasting effects and bring us to a level of self reliance built on personal accountability with very little government interventionism, but still have in place a strong system of rules that let banks know what and who they can lend to and under what circumstances. Shall we investigate? Let's shall...
     
    My Plan Is Based On The Following Premise That:
     
      1. Our credit system is to blame more so than anything first, it needs a major overhaul, it doesn't reflect the complexities we live in. 
      2. Houses can't sprout legs like unsecured credit can, why is there an over emphasis on how good your credit is for home ownership, that is just bassackwards? income is the leverage not credit.
      3. The government needs a personal credit fitness plan just like the USDA does for our daily diet, all based on some real basics.
      4. Stopping the banks from throwing out these high interest low credit limit cards to any and everyone with good to horrible credit, this is the highest risk I know. Does it make sense that this is easier to get than a home you loose just as quick if you default on it? Probably not, there are no REO credit cards after default, this practice needs to stop, there is more of a risk than a home.
      5. Make your credit worthiness based mainly on your earnings: If you want more credit get more income, it's that simple.. this will clean up the welfare rolls quicker than I can tell you.
      6. Make it against the law for a creditor to disquialify you soley on score, they must consider total income net all debts in earnest and base your debt-to-income ratio on that. A system with realistic checks and balaces are far more systemicially empowering than a blanket pay out.

    If we do these simple things to start, we will ignite an almost immediate engine of the greatest economic upheaval we have seen since Reagan.  In American our economy starts with the home. If it is slow there... everything else follows. If it is good here... wow! We cannot be matched anywhere in the world. Go figure on this, what voice in our political strata would have the most to gain from America's banking failure, connect those dots and look at their failure to improve our currency by allowing us to depend heavily on imported fuel by sources that would really rather not sell us anything. The apple doesn't fall that far from the tree on this one. We need true top to bottom reform of our credit system.  Owning a home may be a privilege and not a right, but every American has a right to participate. This fuels would certainly in my opinion participation, what do you think?

      Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

      Bail Out Rant: Paulson, Dems & Republicans Get It Wrong

      Photobucket
       
      Hank Paulson, a long time Wall Street Insider himself could only offer a solution that benefits people in his position. As a former stock broker myself... I can tell you never have the wolves tell you when it's dinner time, especially when you're the main course. Our impudent law makers have opted for looking a solution that is socialist at best, a massive transfer of wealth. Didn't we learn anything thing from the S&L crisis? They did... how to get fat and stick the Fed with the tab... both liberals and conservatives are to blame.
       
      Yet I cannot blame the mortgage companies entirely here... they make loans to who they can, I have said this before in other posts. Our credit system is the problem. Our inventories are strained... 51% of the working populous have a FICO score of under 620.  In a capitalist environment that clearly dictates demand fuels the supply. The supply of creditworthy home owners is in the minority, with the stockpile of home inventory housed by the credit weak. Real estate agents are lording over REO inventories, which most people learned a serious lesson from the first time around 15 years ago.  It begs the question - what happened to the Insider Information Act of  1992? Why should banks be issuing tons of $200 to $1000 credit cards to hundreds of thousands with D credit, when they can walk away and stick everyone. Did I miss something here? Credit cards you can walk away from. A house has no legs, great credit or not... you fall behind and you're out just like someone with bad credit.  We need a credit system, overhaul when the emphasis is on your income above all. When your income becomes the stimulus and overall motivation to live better, it takes the wind out of the sails of  the social justice engineers who blame everything but do nothing
       
      The Fed should have posted the REO's on a web site where people can bid in a lottery style systems where if you purchase a home, you are disqualified from another purchase for three months. You don't need to qualify those homes... you just need to afford them, please tell me how almost instantly our economy would turn around if we put people in homes? The whole thing with the REO inventory is the bank cannot get more money to lend unjtil they right that loan. Now does it make sense that the government step in when there are people who needs homes who could right what the government claims they need to pay out to correct, absolutely not. If they did this one thing, they would oversee the largest expansion and growth of ecomony that could potentially dwarf Reagan era productivity. It is time for a changing of the mental guard in D.C. and no... liberals aren't the solution. But niether are republicans... a social conservative will do just nicely.
       
      Carpe Diem folks... you can't seize the day when you're not living in it.
      Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

      Conservative Rant: Obama's Image Palin In Comparison

      McCain/Palin
      Originally posted on: telegraph.co.uk/that darn republican
       

      Why are late night television hosts attempting to join in along with the tag-a-along subterfuge antics of the virtually audience-less liberal mainstream media nutworks? Why is the U.N. [big surprise here] running interference for the Obama campaign? Why is the arrogance of Barack Obama himself so enveloping it has obscured his ability to see the damage he has actually done to his own campaign efforts? Why is it every Helen Gurley-Brown, bob wearing, bra burning neophyte feminist foaming at the mouth right now? Why is every carob chip eating, owl worshiping, human hating enviro-nut bucket in America having a grand mal seizure in the back of some Starbucks? Why is every militant black liberation theology student on campuses across this country combing every beauty salon in urban landscapes in big cities everywhere looking for an afro pick, with a fist style handle in anticipation of a "get real" moment? It is simple... 5 words, John McCain and Sarah Palin.  

      With his announcement that the Alaskan Governor would accept his offer as the Vice Presidential candidate of choice over such hotly debated choices as Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, former Massechussets Governor Mitt Romney and former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson. The democrats on the far left side of the isle have been acting like deer caught in the headlights of the polar bear express... headed for Washington D.C. This writer has rarely had to step back and take a breath at what can clearly be revealed as some of the most wantonly polarizing stage antics in political history. These progressive voices within their ranks have been behaving truly like the big babies they are.  First out the gate with their anti-Palin gloves on swinging were the feminists, yup! those social vegetarians have scored big points for even bigger lip dragging when it came to attacks on Palin's motherhood, spiritual choices and pro-choice stance.  In 1 hour and 37 minutes, Sarah Palin and John McCain laid waste to leftist bellwethers and spineless, appeasist demagoguery. Sarah simply was charming and delightful, I was taken aback by the choice initially, but quickly thought about the history making dynamics at at play, and then stood back spiritually and saw the shape of man and woman in the White house and saw the theme very quickly taking shape, family... everything the left hates - for all it's worth. 

      McCain showed Barack Obama in the stunning fashion why he belongs back in the hack little leagues, with the rest of the crooked Chicago Daly machine minions. Palin effectively neutered the feminist movement and reduced them to mere irrelevence in one fell swoop, all the media saturation, all of the fashion periodical fascism they could muster was efficiently nipped and tucked by Sarah's approachable personality. Not some androgenous, stolid, stoic, anti-life, anti-male ground troops set loose like the bat experiments of WWII on unsuspecting villages in Japan... to burn them down. How beautiful to know by the time you exited the stage from the Republican National Convention that half the entrenched nut buckets on the other side of the political isle had switched sides by the time the first lattes hit the ground in defiance of police officers sent to keep the peace. A master stroke... truly. The first polls released one week after the convention show either a) a statistical dead heat or b) McCain ahead by at least 10 points. The unhinged and hateful rhetoric from deeply disturbed mainstream media voices such as the newly destroyed MSNBC, who by all means have killed their credibility for all time with some of the most shameful comments and blatant partiality of any news organization on the aire - besides MTV, but hey... we expect them to be stupid, right? But we all knew the MSM were all Tokyo Rose's in disguise anyway so no big surprise there, Kieth Olberman wasn't any good at sports and is even worse a hack at politics. Have some shame will you? It might as well be Michigan vs. Ohio St. when it comes to reporting in their being so forthcoming about their petty allegiances. Time for McCain to bring this one home... because Obama blew his chance.

      Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
      « Previous1Next »