Posted by
That Darn Republican on Tuesday, February 27, 2007 12:28:15 PM

As I recall back in the seventies there was an obscure pot smoking comedian from San Francisco
referring to his home town as a bowl of granola citing the city sported
a few nuts here... some fruits here and there, and whole lot of flakes.
Now his words are nearly prophetic in so many ways. In less that 20
years gay in American has gone from the uncelebrated and morally
unthinkable to if you're not gay... something is wrong with you.
Admittedly these are not the sentiments of most homosexuals engaged in
that behavior, but those of the few, the proud... the obscene. Just
standing outside the paradigm of religiosity and just deal with
homosexuality on its own merits [and I use the words loosely there],
there is absolutely no purpose for the act nor the behavior, it is
completely bio-illogical and is entirely an elective act. We can
proclaim this within the realm of common sense without being going
anywhere else, it's simply not how we got here. However, as I eluded
to a moment ago, many homosexual individuals are quite cognizant of
their behavior and fall into one of two camps, those who know better
and those who don't' care. Those who know better exhibit a different
social decorum about their alternative sexuality. Those who don't care
make every attempt to rid the environment of anything that can convict
behavior about the act and even go further to say that gender in no
longer up to God, they claim it is up how you feel... meaning simply if
you were born male but simply wish to be associated with the opposite
sex, well that is something that needs to be observed; the same is
observed for women.
A popular misconception is that most gay
individuals is that they actually want to have gay "marriage"... that
couldn't be further from the truth. Only the irreverent nutters in
their ranks get off on openly making a mockery of the institution of
marriage because it is the crux of their rebellion against normal social
and moral convention, that and it suits other voices on the socially
deviant specter of society that has no need for any convention that
submits to behavioral correction, moral clarity or decency. For this
they live in open rebelion of any convention that brings a focus on
spiritual cleanliness through a religious affiliation [God based] they
have the unmitigated gal to thumb their nose like it is some remedial
superstition for the lowly and socially disadvantaged, while these
big-brained cubbyhole reprobates openly plug their disaffection as the
hit parade. Fully knowing the moral, social and moral implications of
a societies health when it openly advocates such clearly self
destructive behavior. Simply... a people cannot stand when a man is
doing another man. Women get caught up in lesbianism for very different
reason then their male counterparts. A society that allows its media
outlets to openly advocate a socially destructive behavior will not
stand. The people are not the problem, it's the act, it simply is
wrong. It is a purely elective and a matter of choice... I don't are
what they claim, they will never find a gay gene, that is like pastor
of a charismatic church praying out foul demons of unemployment....
say what? come again? Not so... there is no such thing, and if so...
the gypsies would have cornered the market already.
Yet these
nutters have been told time after time, by members of their society
liberal or more conservative they through the voice afforded them
constitutionally through the act of referendum on ballot issues
regarding that matter they have said emphatically... No! So they have
craftily constructed embarrassingly insulting arguments somehow
confusing the civil rights arguments for social and legal equality for
Black American's during that time in the late fifties and on through
the sixties as somehow to be morally equated to their "plight", what
they have done in that is let Blacks in this country know what real
pathological liberals are about, and fairness and equality is nowhere
in their radar range. They are just as ethnically biased as the
conservatives they accuse on the right, not because there is any truth
to it, simply because it is more comfortable for us to accept that
image of ethnic bigotry... when they show us every day whet they are
not about. They ar not about to be realistic because they are openly
attempting to advance their warped agenda in our schools, we even have
to catch ourselves and the PC term we use... it is nothing short of the
rhetoric of exclusion. Like the word parenting, in California last year
was the assault from the nutter bunch from sophomore Senator Sheila
Keuhl, and nutter buddies in the assembly like insurgent Mark Leno,
openly gay legislators suing for the normalization of homosexuality in
schools... they are openly attacking gender specificity.
Here
is why, if you are a mother and father, well that insults gender
neutrals or those who perceive their sexuality [yes... you heard it].
They feel they have a right not to be insulted before the actual
biologically capable are to be considered. Words like parenting
neutralize gender specific identity of the role in question... because
to these sexually confused, morally inept projectors anyone can be a
parent, gay.. lesbian... or, them i.e. straight. So the legislation AB
606 and SB1437 and a slurry of others illicit bills for consideration
were aimed at striking out what they term as hate speech, that's
right... identifying a man or woman in a California school as a mother
or father would be considered hate speech. The thought alone is
perverted... but people, this is what we are dealing with. A mind that
is as reversed as two males or two females engaged in a sex act
intended for the pleasure of intramarital sexual gratification and
chiefly for procreation has be diluted to "do what cha' like cuz it
feelz good... to me" We have the right, we have the moral wherewithal,
and the existing constitutional authority to put the kibosh on this
nonsense, since living in America with basic civil consent wasn't good
enough, maybe they need to feel what it's like not have that luxury?
It's up to us...
-That Darn Republican