About Me

Name: That Darn Republican
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Advancing Gay Geopolitics vs. American Social Values: Who Wins in The End?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

As I recall back in the seventies there was an obscure pot smoking comedian from San Francisco referring to his home town as a bowl of granola citing the city sported a few nuts here... some fruits here and there, and whole lot of flakes.  Now his words are nearly prophetic in so many ways.  In less that 20 years gay in American has gone from the uncelebrated and morally unthinkable to if you're not gay... something is wrong with you.  Admittedly these are not the sentiments of most homosexuals engaged in that behavior, but those of the few, the proud... the obscene.  Just standing outside the paradigm of religiosity and just deal with homosexuality on its own merits [and I use the words loosely there], there is absolutely no purpose for the act nor the behavior, it is completely bio-illogical and is entirely an elective act.  We can proclaim this within the realm of common sense without being going anywhere else, it's simply not how we got here.  However, as I eluded to a moment ago, many homosexual individuals are quite cognizant of their behavior and fall into one of two camps, those who know better and those who don't' care.  Those who know better exhibit a different social decorum about their alternative sexuality.  Those who don't care make every attempt to rid the environment of anything that can convict behavior about the act and even go further to say that gender in no longer up to God, they claim it is up how you feel... meaning simply if you were born male but simply wish to be associated with the opposite sex, well that is something that needs to be observed; the same is observed for women.

A popular misconception is that most gay individuals is that they actually want to have gay "marriage"... that couldn't be further from the truth. Only the irreverent nutters in their ranks get off on openly making a mockery of the institution of marriage because it is the crux of their rebellion against normal social and moral convention, that and it suits other voices on the socially deviant specter of society that has no need for any convention that submits to behavioral correction, moral clarity or decency.  For this they live in open rebelion of any convention that brings a focus on spiritual cleanliness through a religious affiliation [God based] they have the unmitigated gal to thumb their nose like it is some remedial superstition for the lowly and socially disadvantaged, while these big-brained cubbyhole reprobates openly plug their disaffection as the hit parade.  Fully knowing the moral, social and moral implications of a societies health when it openly advocates such clearly self destructive behavior.  Simply... a people cannot stand when a man is doing another man. Women get caught up in lesbianism for very different reason then their male counterparts.  A society that allows its media outlets to openly advocate a socially destructive behavior will not stand.  The people are not the problem, it's the act, it simply is wrong.  It is a purely elective and a matter of choice... I don't are what they claim, they will never find a gay gene, that is like pastor of a charismatic church  praying out foul demons of unemployment.... say what? come again? Not so... there is no such thing, and if so... the gypsies would have cornered the market already.

Yet these nutters have been told time after time, by members of their society liberal or more conservative they through the voice afforded them constitutionally through the act of referendum on ballot issues regarding that matter they have said emphatically... No! So they have craftily constructed embarrassingly insulting arguments somehow confusing the civil rights arguments for social and legal equality for Black American's during that time in the late fifties and on through the sixties as somehow to be morally equated to their "plight", what they have done in that is let Blacks in this country know what real pathological liberals are about, and fairness and equality is nowhere in their radar range.  They are just as ethnically biased as the conservatives they accuse on the right, not because there is any truth to it, simply because it is more comfortable for us to accept that image of ethnic bigotry... when they show us every day whet they are not about.  They ar not about to be realistic because they are openly attempting to advance their warped agenda in our schools, we even have to catch ourselves and the PC term we use... it is nothing short of the rhetoric of exclusion. Like the word parenting, in California last year was the assault from the nutter bunch from sophomore Senator Sheila Keuhl, and nutter buddies in the assembly like insurgent Mark Leno, openly gay legislators suing for the normalization of homosexuality in schools... they are openly attacking gender specificity.

Here is why, if you are a mother and father, well that insults gender neutrals or those who perceive their sexuality [yes... you heard it]. They feel they have a right not to be insulted before the actual biologically capable are to be considered.  Words like parenting neutralize gender specific identity of the role in question... because to these sexually confused, morally inept projectors anyone can be a parent, gay.. lesbian... or, them i.e. straight.  So the legislation AB 606 and SB1437 and a slurry of others illicit bills for consideration were aimed at striking out what they term as hate speech, that's right... identifying a man or woman in a California school as a mother or father would be considered hate speech. The thought alone is perverted... but people, this is what we are dealing with. A mind that is as reversed as two males or two females engaged in a sex act intended for the pleasure of intramarital sexual gratification and chiefly for procreation has be diluted to "do what cha' like cuz it feelz good... to me" We have the right, we have the moral wherewithal, and the existing constitutional authority to put the kibosh on this nonsense, since living in America with basic civil consent wasn't good enough, maybe they need to feel what it's like not have that luxury? It's up to us...



-That Darn Republican
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Frankenhack for Senate... You've No Doubt Heard

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting 

When is enough... [reasonably] enough? I believe this happens when a breach has occurred. Such a breach is one of reason, one of understanding... certainly one of self valued interpretation of social relevance... in English, breathing one's own fumes.  Can one man represent a living, breathing conundrum of such? Yes. Al Franken can be that man? Abso-friggin-lutely! Can Minnesotan's claim Al Franken as one of theirs and wake up in the morning not needing a mental colonic? Can they look at the their homes, automobiles and personal property and consider all the hard work it took to acquire it, and conscienably feel good about a native voice within their ranks so dispossessed by reason and accountability... it actually thinks they would benefit from such an egredious cessation of common sense?

That [somehow] a belief system that pits itself against the very reality of ownership, discipline and hard work that it took to acquire these pieces of eight in the landscape of the American Dream in the first place to be supplanted by a belief that embodies a notion that they should not actually own any of it, or if you do... the government should have played a strong role in how you came upon it's acquisition? Is this the same mind that spun its own national Coup by airwaves... apparently so popular and socially viable that it did a ValueJet... but if the government owned it, he'd still be on the airwaves. But, wait[as they say] there's more! If the world was the way he needs it for the way he wants to live in the first place, he wouldn't' need to be on the air... hmmmm? now there is ex-post facto non sequitur built right in there... something to consider.

Al Franken should get an SBA loan.... and open a revolutionary chain of coffeehouses, he can call them: Big Al's Frankenbean... see I'm helping him. He can vent his globalist ideals, and ambitions out on Starbucks...  But [alas...] I think Howard Schultz is just wee bit smarter than he.  After all socialists are capitalists with a 2.0 GPA and the hope of eternal scholarship at public expense. The people of Minnesota have something to now consider in 08' but then again, this is the State that put a pro wrestler in office... ya' never know?


-That Darn Republican

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Telling The Diffeence Between The MSM Reports and Coffeehouse Chatter?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Have you ever sat in a coffeehouse attempting to enjoy whatever it is you ordered over a din of toxic ear pollution from "hive" minded liberal nut buddies just lashing into anything they cannot understand... or contraband their lifestyle? Well such an occurrence happened to me recently over a cheese danish and a Mocha Mint Latte'... with a couple of nutters on the side.  Not having at all understood that Kim Jung-Il and his bevy of hack neo- communist archetypes where plotting to back bone any sabre-rattling regime with nukes to make all sort of social statements.. the most strident in which is, we cut and run.  We'll make noise for a season... we may even talk blockade, or troops. But, nah... they can always depend on America's morally anemic, Euro nut sympathisers to raze the fanfare of global this or world that... just so long as they look "kewl" to their Chomsky reading hive members. 

Now that North Korea has begun to see the light a little and neutralize a majority of their inventory under reasonable pressure diplomatically... these pair of tag-team coffeehouse philosophizers obviously didn't' get that note.  Their whole argument was: "we're instigators... " when the Socratic methodology of linear reason was applied in the form of simple one-line questions such as: "How is it America is an instigator?" and "Where we supposed to continue to allow N. Korea to continue to supply our enemies with conventional arms, the fall asleep at the helm by allowing them to produce a nuke to then shake us down with it?" you could hear a ghost rip one. I saw the complex wheels of a ADD [Anti-Discipline Dysfunction] tantrum start ticking -- comprising of stifled responses, attempted finger pointing, loose Franken references... but no intelligible response, so I  cut the air abruptly with a follow up as an older man in his 70's leaned to listen in ".. so, what I hear you openly advocating is America should bring a knife to a gun fight.... all because you know others will have guns and it's American's time to play with the knife... right?"  I said in a Pee Wee Hermaneque tone... they literally hissed and left, I kid you not. Where do these lacksidaisical do nothings, but say everythings come from?  The best thing I heard was naval blockade... backing straight forward economic sanctions; as former U.S. President Teddy Roosevelt used to refer to as glove covered, iron-fisted diplomacy. Our MSM is steadily undimining every effort to delay the reality of truth or avoid it all together.  They could look right into a mirror at themselves and themselves someone else.  N. Korea needs to be checked now so Iran doesn't have another backdoor, Putin is bad enough right now. But as long as their are Russian billionaires, and millionaires... they will keep hitting the capitalist panic switch if he starts to get too comfortable with getting away with old USSR[isms]. This never ceases to amaze me the ignorance of liberals and their cloak of stupidity they very happily wear... sad, it's appears to be trendy.



-That Darn Republican
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »