Posted by
That Darn Republican on Tuesday, October 31, 2006 12:53:32 PM
[Edited...lol]
It has been established throughout the history of our great nation that we have had a system of checks and balances based on fair, ethical clear moral sensibilities structured on historical evidences and spiritual principles that have spanned the ages and proven themselves beneficial and reliable to any productive body politic that employs them. However, this circuit court judge that handed down the most glaringly arrogant and biased ruling in the New Jersey case and the New Orleans Circuit Court of Appeals... both, with the commentary in his opinion that the electorate was employing "value judgments" was out of line... and senseless, and antithetical to the best traditions of our culture and law here in America.
The question remains, how are we as a people to negate the amoral rantings of an overtly biased and obviously vitriolic left leaning judges as advocates in our judiciary flagrantly bypassing referendum in lieu of their nutter agendas? When has it ever been this blatant? When we can clearly see what it is they are doing, yet we fail to act to interdict these rulings that are counterproductive to society, they become [soft] precedents. Once this occurs it becomes harder to fight it within the flexibility established within constitutional limits. We have been dealing with this since Marbury vs. Madison. When we have the ability to hog tie their actions and prevent them from allowing this country to be controlled by a vicious and fascist minority clearly set outside of the bounds of a moral constitution shaping legal policy on social issues that are inherently socially self destructive, this simply just cannot be. They are openly acting outside of the moral guidelines of the spirit and the letter of our standing laws, this and common sense, which seems to be as rare as fresh air in LA nowadays. They claim you cannot legislate morality... reality dictates an entirely different situation, without morals you cannot have law. You are left with "policies" and policies can be revised until you are blue in the face... there are no immutable over arching principles defining virtue and clarity in enforcement. Precisely what the left can life with, but exactly what no nation can stand and flourish on.
If we could trust that states rights could act within their sovereignty to not abate the will of the people or the nature of the constitution, this would be a non-issue, but [historically] it was democrats that sued for war to hold slavery legal, it was democrats after the war lobbying for separatist legislation barring equal participation in voting rights for black voters and other minorities, it was a more liberal mind that formed the ACLU an American Communist front, along with Margaret Sanger and her Planned Parenthood thugs... where have they varied from their roots? Not too far as we can see clearly what they don't' represent, and we can see who's not represented in their ranks. They always have been philosophizing social elitists, who are bigots by virtue of the myopic scope of who and what is socially acceptable to them. Clearly the one thing that has survived along with Platonic and Socratic self-worship is their propensity for immoral sexual indulgences. Today's deluxe reprobate mind is no different, however the price to be paid for engaging their ideals to risk of our own standing at present is a gamble no right-minded, morally balanced society can survive without.
Entertaining their ideals will destroy our nation if we let them, if we don't close the loopholes so visible to us on how they are undermining our federal laws and negatively impacting our nations future... we are doomed. We inherited this country, it is not an entitlement. What condition it is in is up to us... most people grow their inheritance, not run it into the ground. We have a moral duty to provide and maintain this great nation for future generations and we cannot do it stealing, we are stealing their futures by not acting; all because a few nutters want to live outside the bounds on decency. They are free to pretty much do that... they have far more freedom here and they know it, but they are the house guest that wants to take over the house; this is not America, is this not America?
A simple amendment covering two aspects of any federal, state and local elected officials and appointees. Their duties should include under penalty of treason for abating them are under an over arching umbrella of filtering out behavior that is not consistent with the nature of their elected posts, or engaging in activities that detract from or are in clear opposition to their stated duties. Whenever people are insulated... their natures come out completely if not balanced or rooted in the Word of God. These judges and appointees act with impunity to hasten their agenda into effect. It needs to emphasize:
- Legislators cannot author legislation that is not morally clear, and will have a negative impact on society and future generations as a whole.
- State and Federal Appointees may not rule against the best traditions, values and moral codec laid by the constitution. They will be held in contempt and punishment could be severe including sedition.
- End all tenured positions under the level of Supreme Court, that means education staffers as well. This will bring greater accountability to the people by-in-large.
- No piggy-backing legislation to dull the impact of the legislation.
Those simple steps will allow us to garner the reigns of our elected officials again and redirect our focus back on simple governance and provision on the long road toward reclaiming the road we started out on. We are federal lifestyle protection acgency, left needs to understand this clearly and that there are clear lines between what is right and what is wrong. The sooner we commit to this the sonner we'll improve our social climate here. Those simple steps will allow us to garner the reigns of our elected officials again and redirect our focus back on simple governance and provision on the long road toward reclaiming the road we started out on. We are federal lifestyle protection acgency, left needs to understand this clearly and that there are clear lines between what is right and what is wrong. The sooner we commit to this the sonner we'll improve our social climate here. I agree with modern social scientists inasmuch they admit as a multicultural society we will perrish. As a nation with strong familiar values and morally clear basis for our legal system to provide the freedoms we all enjoy from day to day regardless of your ethnicity or what culture you associate with, we will all be able to exist together as good as man can knowing our natures. I agree with modern social scientists that as amulticulturla nation we will perrish. As a nation with strong familiar values and morally clear basis for our legal system to provide the freedoms we all enjoy from day to day regardless of your ethnicity or what culture you associate with, we will all be able to exist together as good as man can knowing our natures.
-Chrystopher Smith
[that darn republican]